-After peer review and thinking of ways to improve my project. I believe I do a solid job of Identifying relatable ideas from Gee and Brandt and show how those ideas are present in my chosen literacy narratives. This fits into the Affirming – The literacy narrative samples from the archive confirm (align with, support, or show the validity of) something in Gee/Brandt/Alexander. W with my topic a hand being “having a literacy sponsor or sponsors is important in gaining access into the Discourse of literacy. I believe the best way to also add another aspect to my paper as far as affirming adding or challenging, would be to challenge the Gee and Brandt texts using a Literacy narrative that goes against their ideas of the importance of a sponsor and the necessary things to be in a Discourse.
-I feel like I properly give enough info on Gee and brandt that anybody who reads my paper can understand what I’m talking about without reading either text. That being said I only go over essential things to my topic.
-I feel if I go over the Gee and Brandt Texts again before looking for a literacy narrative that can challenge what they have to say, I could better formulate a plan to challenge GEE and Brandt.
collreadwrit2e