1. Brandt sees print making as a source for literacy development because it enabled access to material production and the public meaning/worth of their skills. However, Brandt finds a paradox within the rise of the penny press. Although the penny press made print more accessible it brought an end to a form of literacy sponsorship/drop … [Read more…]
1. Brandt sees print making as a source for literacy development because it enabled access to material production and the public meaning/worth of their skills. However, Brandt finds a paradox within the rise of the penny press. Although the penny press made print more accessible it brought an end to a form of literacy sponsorship/drop in literate potential.
2. Literacy sponsors can support those they sponsor in a financial way… For example Brandt writes about Raymond Branch and how he was the son of an academic, and grew up in an “information rich, resource-rich learning environment” which helped him pursue in literary development. Sponsors can also suppress literacy development from those who are the opposite of Raymond Branch, like Dora Lopez who had to self-initiate learning because of her cultural and economic background. However, she was being sponsored by what her parents could pull from the peripheral service systems from the university.
3. “Literacy, like land, is a valued commodity in this economy, a key resource in gaining profit and edge” (Brandt 558). However, some people may have complicated relationships with reading and writing due to their home environment and their economical status. There are children out there and even adults who would enjoy a regular education like everyone else has, but sometimes people cannot afford to send their children to school, to send themselves back to school, or getting a proper education may never be as important to them as it is to others.
4. “Throughout their lives, affluent people from high-caste racial groups have multiple and redundant contacts with powerful literacy sponsors as a routine part of their economic and political privileges. Poor people and those from low-caste racial groups have less consistent, less politically secured access to literacy sponsors – especially to the ones that can grease their way to academic and economic success”(Brandt 559). Within this part of the article, Gee can relate Branch and Lopez in the form of literacy by comparing Discourses. Seeing as Branch is in a higher socio-economic class he is in a more developed Discourse as opposed to Lopez who is in a not-so-developed class where she has to self-initiate learning.
collreadwrit2e
55 minutes